indus

Not Unicorns

Steve Farmer Go to article downloads. Below is visual evidence to illustrate a post I made on the private ScholarlyServices List (primarily made up of Indologists) on 3 April 2004. The original post, slightly edited, is included for convenience: Naga Ganesan quotes Possehl on the unicorn: pg. 131, G. Possehl, The Indus civ., a contemporaryperspective, 2002…

Example of One of Many Distinctive Low-Frequency Signs Found on Elite Indus Seals

M-6 a from Mohenjo-daro. Actual width approximately 5.5 cm — about twice the size of the average ‘unicorn’ seal. H-129 a from Harappa. Actual width is approximately 6.4 cm. M-1188 a, from Mohenjo-daro. Originally part of a very large seal. Estimated size of original size approximately 5 cm.

Not everything that glitters is gold – and not all ancient symbols were part of writing systems

The Illiterate Harappans, No. 1 – the first of a series of illustrated mini-essays on the Indus symbol system Text © 2001 Steve Farmer Below left. King Ashurnasirpal II of Assyria (9th century BCE), pointing to symbols of his patron gods. Some of the same symbols are suspended from his necklace and worn around his wrists as…

Claims Concerning the Longest Indus ‘Inscription’

The longest Indus ‘inscription’ (if that’s the right word) on a single flat surface is M-314, which contains 17 non-repeating symbols. Like all but one Indus ‘inscription’, it is tiny – just how tiny is clear when we compare M-314 with a proto-Elamite inscription. Indus-script adherents sometimes claim (usually quickly, and without much discussion) that the…

The Problem of ‘Reconstructed’ Indus Inscriptions

It is important never to rely on the linear representations of Indus inscriptions found in concordances, catalogs, and studies of Indus symbols, since these often badly distort the data. Five Cases of ‘Dubious Writing’ in Indus Inscriptions (1.6 Megs), pp. 4 and 16, give illustrations of typical types of mistranscriptions and questionable conflations of signs in…

A One-Sentence Refutation of the Indus-Script Myth

Not one ancient literate civilization is known — including those that wrote routinely on perishable materials — that didn’t also leave long texts behind on durable materials. That’s all it takes to refute the 130-year-old Indus-script myth — and it is only one of numerous obvious arguments. Despite the fact that the Indus symbols were…

$10,000 Prize Announced by Farmer, Sproat, and Witzel

in Conjunction with the Publication of The Collapse of the Indus-Script Thesis: The Myth of a Literate Harappan Civilization (PDF) (Text of the Prize Offering fixed in December 2004; Webpage formatting updated February 2007) Prize Announcement Turn up just one Indus inscription that contains at least 50 symbols distributed in the outwardly random-appearing ways typical of…